Cem Ilkel vs Johan Nikles Head-to-Head Stats, Results & Performance Comparison
Wojtek Kolan
HEAD TO HEAD
C. Ilkel vs J. Nikles

Cem Ilkel
TUR
w
l
w
w
w
l
l
l
w
l
2
Win
2
Played
0
Win
30
Age
28
6'0" (183 cm)
Height
5'7" (170 cm)
580
C. Rank
581
144
Best Rank
256
0
Total Titles
0
0
YTD Titles
0
$225.5K
Career Money
$11.7K
Right-Handed
Plays
Right-Handed

Johan Nikles
SUI
w
w
w
w
w
w
w
l
w
l
2
Win
2
Played
0
Win
30
Age
28
6'0" (183 cm)
Height
5'7" (170 cm)
580
C. Rank
581
144
Best Rank
256
0
Total Titles
0
0
YTD Titles
0
$225.5K
Career Money
$11.7K
Right-Handed
Plays
Right-Handed
Head-to-head: Ilkel 2 - 0 Nikles
They have played 4 sets in total, with Cem Ilkel winning 4 and Johan Nikles winning 0. The last match between Cem Ilkel and Johan Nikles was at the M15 Zahra, 09-02-2025, Round: F, Surface: Hard, with Cem Ilkel getting the victory 6-1 6-1.
| Players | Head To Head Match Wins |
|---|---|
| Ilkel | 2 |
| Nikles | 0 |
Last 2 H2H Matches:
(F) M15 Zahra(02-09-25)
Cem Ilkel
6
6
Johan Nikles
1
1
(R1) Lugano Challenger(03-05-24)
Cem Ilkel
6
6
Johan Nikles
0
3
C. Ilkel vs J. Nikles H2H Profile
C. Ilkel vs J. Nikles Match Preview:
- Second serve performance recent form: In recent form (last 6 months), Cem Ilkel has won 58.57% of points on their second serve, while Johan Nikles has won 42.57%. There is a high correlation between this stat and match prediction accuracy.
- Return game stats recent form: Return stats show Cem Ilkel, in recent form, has won 49.47% of their opponent's second serve points, while Johan Nikles has won 47.20%. The same stats for first serve returns are 19.62% and 31.82% respectively and this has a high correlation to pick who is favored in this H2H matchup.
- Under pressure analysis: Cem Ilkel has saved 63.16% of breakpoints in recent form, whereas Johan Nikles has saved 48.24% which is a useful statistic for in-game betting predictions.
- Performance overview: Over the last year Cem Ilkel has won 71.43% of matches played (W/L 30/12), with Johan Nikles winning 61.02% (W/L 36/23) that gives us an overall head-to head prediction overview.
- Best surface: Cem Ilkel has their best career surface win % on Hard, winning 61% (W/L 288/181), and worse career win % on Grass, winning 10% (W/L 1/9). Johan Nikles has their best career surface win % on Hard, winning 61% (W/L 97/58), and worse career win % on I.hard, winning 23% (W/L 3/10).
- Player level: In the last year, Cem Ilkel has played most of their matches on the Futures/Satellites/ITF tournaments $10K, winning 76.32% of matches (W/L 29/9), where as Johan Nikles has played most of their matches on the Futures/Satellites/ITF tournaments $10K, winning 64.29% of matches (W/L 36/20). When comparing stats between players to predict the favorite, it is of course all relative to the event level they have been playing at.
- Direct H2H matches: They have played 2 times before with Cem Ilkel winning 2 times and Johan Nikles being victorious 0 times. They have played 4 sets in total, with Cem Ilkel winning 4 and Johan Nikles winning 0.
- The last match between Cem Ilkel and Johan Nikles was at the M15 Zahra, 09-02-2025, Round: F, Surface: Hard, with Cem Ilkel getting the victory 6-1 6-1.
- Head to head match duration: In past head to head matches, the average match time between these players has been 1:13:59.
- Opponent quality stats: Over the last 12 months, Cem Ilkel has played against opponents with an average rank of 423.45 while Johan Nikles has played against players with an average rank of 375.19.
- Deciding set performance vs all players: If you are interested in live predictions and betting, if this match goes into a deciding set, Cem Ilkel has won 80% of deciding sets over the last 12 months, while Johan Nikles has won 44% in all matches played on tour.
- Break point conversion: In recent form, Cem Ilkel has converted 11.76% of breakpoint opportunities, and Johan Nikles has converted 38.79% of their chances to break their opponents serve. A telling stat for in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.
Cem Ilkel vs Johan Nikles Editorial Preview By TennisTipster88.
C. Ilkel vs J. Nikles H2H Stats Used In Our Predictions
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 2 | H2H Matches Won | 0 |
| 4 | Sets Won | 0 |
| 24 | Games Won | 5 |
| 4 | Aces (Total) | 0 |
| 3 | Total Double Faults | 7 |
| 1:13:59 | Average Match Time | 1:13:59 |
| 58% (50/86) | 1st Serve % | 54% (61/112) |
| 76% (38/50) | 1st Serve Win % | 52% (32/61) |
| 56% (20/36) | 2nd Serve Win % | 25% (13/51) |
| 46% (11/24) | Break Pts Won % | 50% (2/4) |
| 60% (67/112) | Return Points Win % | 33% (28/86) |
| 100% (2/2) | Best‑of‑3 Win % | 0% (0/2) |
| 100% (2/2) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/2) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/0) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 0% (0/2) |
Recent Performance Stats
2nd Serve Win %: Ilkel 58%, Nikles 50%.
Opp 2nd Serve Pts Won: Ilkel 52%, Nikles 55%.
Break Points Saved %: Ilkel 61%, Nikles 54%.
C. Ilkel Recent Matches Played
| OPPONENT | RESULT | SCORE | H2H | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
R2 | L | 6-4 6-7(5) 7-6(7) | ||
R1 | W | 6-4 6-3 | ||
Q1 | L | 7-6(4) 6-3 | ||
R1 | L | 6-2 6-4 | ||
SF | L | 6-4 6-4 | ||
J. Nikles Recent Matches Played
| OPPONENT | RESULT | SCORE | H2H | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
R2 | L | 6-4 6-2 | ||
R1 | W | 6-3 6-0 | ||
SF | L | 4-6 6-3 6-3 | ||
QF | W | 6-3 3-6 6-3 | ||
R2 | W | 7-6(6) 3-2 ret. | ||

C. Ilkel vs J. Nikles Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 56.52% (438/337) | YTD Win/Loss | 58.55% (322/228) |
| 54.63% (979/813) | Sets Win/Loss | 56.88% (715/542) |
| 51.54% (8791/8267) | Games Win/Loss | 52.97% (6118/5431) |
| 61.41% (288/181) | Hard Win/Loss | 62.58% (97/58) |
| 44.53% (57/71) | Clay Win/Loss | 59.29% (217/149) |
| 54.76% (92/76) | Indoor Hard W/L | 27.59% (8/21) |
| 10.00% (1/9) | Grass Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) |
| 0.34 | Aces Per Game | 0.06 |
| 2865 | Aces Total | 350 |
| 0.17 | Double Faults Per Game | 0.21 |
| 1385 | Total Double Faults | 1167 |
| 1:15:9 | Average Match Time | 1:24:7 |
| 560.74 | Average Opponent Rank | 507.6 |
| 58% (24152/41308) | 1st Serve % | 66% (20790/31479) |
| 70% (16999/24152) | 1st Serve Win % | 61% (12641/20790) |
| 51% (8757/17156) | 2nd Serve Win % | 48% (5104/10689) |
| 40% (1622/4023) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 46% (1822/3949) |
| 39% (16247/41803) | Return Points Win % | 45% (14386/31854) |
| 31.82% (7/15) | Slam W/L | 0% (0/0) |
| 66.67% (2/1) | Masters W/L | 0% (0/0) |
| 31.82% (7/15) | Cups W/L | 0% (0/0) |
| 17.86% (5/23) | Main Tour W/L | 33.33% (4/8) |
| 52.23% (176/161) | Challenger W/L | 49.41% (42/43) |
| 66.39% (241/122) | Futures W/L | 60.93% (276/177) |
| 56% (426/756) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 59% (318/542) |
| 40% (4/10) | Best of 5 Sets Win % | 100% (1/1) |
| 53% (147/275) | Tiebreaks Win % (Total) | 55% (65/118) |
| 56% (130/233) | Deciding Set Win % | 55% (89/163) |
| 85% (424/362) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 87% (307/267) |
| 14% (424/60) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 13% (307/39) |
| 21% (350/74) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 23% (243/55) |
Other Tennis Predictions Today
11:35 AM 15/11/25
Prediction04:05 PM 15/11/25
Prediction02:05 PM 15/11/25
Prediction02:15 PM 15/11/25
Prediction11:10 PM 15/11/25
Prediction02:05 PM 15/11/25
PredictionTennis Previews & Betting Tips
15 Nov 2025
Nitto ATP Finals – Turin Preview And Prediction: Jannik Sinner vs Alex De Minaur Betting Tips & Picks November 15, 2025
15 Nov 2025
Prediction Of Zverev Vs Auger-Aliassime H2H, Who Will Win At ATP Nitto Atp Finals 2025?
15 Nov 2025
Prediction Of Sinner Vs Shelton H2H, Who Will Win At ATP Nitto Atp Finals 2025?
14 Nov 2025
Alexander Zverev vs Felix Auger Aliassime Prediction – ATP Nitto ATP Finals – 14th November 2025 Best Bets
14 Nov 2025
Rebecca Sramkova vs Solana Sierra Prediction – WTA Billie Jean King Cup, PO, Group C – 14th November 2025 Best Bets
14 Nov 2025
Montevideo Challenger Preview And Prediction: Adolfo Daniel Vallejo vs Cristian Garin Betting Tips & Picks November 15, 2025
Top Predictions Today
16:05
H2H 12-0
22:30
H2H 4-3
H2H 0-0
12:35
H2H 0-0
14:05
H2H 0-0
Tennis Events This Week
Nitto ATP Finals - Turin
Italy
Brisbane 3 Challenger
Australia
Champaign Challenger
United States
Drummondville Challenger
Canada
Lyon Challenger
France
Montevideo Challenger
Uruguay
M15 Antalya
Turkey
M15 Azul
Argentina
M15 Criciuma
Brazil
M15 Heraklion
Greece
M15 Las Palmas de Gran Canaria
Spain
M15 Luanda
Angola
M15 Orlando
United States
M15 San Gregorio di Catania
Italy
M25 Columbus
United States
M25 Manama
Bahrain
M25 Manzanillo
Mexico
M25 Monastir
Tunisia
M25 Vale do Lobo
Portugal